Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has become a generic rule that external visitors are supposed to pay more than the local visitors for getting access into any cultural and historical attractions. It is often argued that this is a positive approach towards the earning money while other disagrees that this may create wrong impression about our culture and country. Therefore, this article agrees that earning foreign currency is one of the popular ways for development of any nation. In this essay we will discuss about the positive and negative points supporting to the statement.
It is obvious that exchange of foreign money could be a great path for financial growth between countries. It is therefore agreed that foreigners should purchase high valued ticket whereas local people are allowed to buy actual ticket value. For instance, Taj Mahal which is renowned as one of 8th wonders of the world, to enter there non-Indians pay double than the Indian citizen.
In other hand, there are people who disagree with such ideas of paying high price even though the visitors are coming outside of India. According to their standpoint, country should treat all people equally as traveller’s. Paying high could create difference among the visitors and this essay disagrees that outsiders are liable to buy expensive tickets. For example, there are places where folks pay equal values while entering into particular visiting spot.
In short, while benefits of earning foreign currency could be beneficial in some aspects in order to provide economical support to the country, still some believes that all visitors should be treated equally in terms of buying ticket for cultural and historical attractions. However, keeping in mind the economic aspects of country, in my opinion, foreigners should pay more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...dpoint, country should treat all people equally as traveller’s. Paying high could create d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 110, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ial in some aspects in order to provide economical support to the country, still some beli...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in short, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26315789474 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52362429726 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575438596491 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6732314346 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.384615385 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343900983952 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111906171757 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867409413885 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19697047486 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345341331989 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.