In the future, it seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think that more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. TO what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that continue to live on planet Earth may become less viable in the near future. Owing to this possibility, some people believe that more funds ought to be spent on discovering the probability of living on Mars for example. I entirely disagree with this idea, and this essay will discuss the reasons for my opinion.
For one, although plenty of researches are being done in the field of space discovery since the 19th century, only the nature of some planets have been revealed, and no research has come with a lucid proof that any of these planets can be an alternative to mother Earth. Therefore, the huge sums of money that is being spent on such field might be all in vain. An additional point is the failure of part of these discoveries is burdening the shoulders of the national economies, such as the disaster of the Challenger shuttle that took place in the year 2001 in the USA, for which economy of America was adversely affected. It is, thus, recommended to focus on our planet development rather that investing in unuseful space exploration.
In addition to this, the unsuitable conditions, which are now ubiquitous on Earth, are due to human’s daily destructive activities. To exemplify, global warming, deforestation, and the like, all are results of mankind negative actions that deserve all the possible cash in order to get improved. By funding new applicable solutions such as recycling and increasing the green lands, people can reform their own planet; hence, enjoy living on it for more upcoming decades. That is to say, people can lead a significantly safe life on earth if they opt for developing it.
To conclude, due t the fragile possibility of finding an appropriate alternative to live on, and the substantial results that people can obtain by improving environmental conditions on Earth, I reiterate that spending extra money on space discoveries is completely unjustifiable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01863354037 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8827437967 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605590062112 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.2597766865 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261144172368 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887127129737 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697700760307 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148069917158 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468041480493 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.