Nowadays, in some countries, It is fundamental that parents provide the pocket cash to their their children, while others think it can cause some negative effects. This essay will discuss both of benefits and drawbacks and I will give my opinion.
On the one hand, poker money can provide servral benifits to the children. Some parents are too busy to prepare the foods or drinks for children instead of offering money so they can buy it from the shop at school.be an emergenc cash for children. The money also benefit when there is an emergency situation happen. For example, I remember that day, I was lost when I on the way home. luckily, I have coin to call my father immediately so my father is able to find me and pick me up to home safely. Moreover, children can learn how to manage their income when received the pocket money from parents.
On the other hand, some people think that children might to worship on more money because they can purchase what they want, such as toys, sneak and so on. If parent didn’t adjective this behavior, which will cause a overspending habit. They might start to value things by money without moral thinking. Nowadays, there are several cases relative to this circumstance because parent gives much pocket money to their children without teaching them how to use it.
In conclusion, although this issue has lots concern on it pros and cons for given the pocket money to the children. I believe that is necessary to provide the money but parent should teaching their child how to use it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...jective this behavior, which will cause a overspending habit. They might start to...
^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld teaching their child how to use it.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7984496124 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5533664656 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554263565891 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.96934078 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.2307692308 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122153246267 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468872607821 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040190647914 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798369659063 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210489236938 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.