goverment should make laws about people's nutrient and food choice. Others argue that is their choce. Discuss both view and give opinion.
Human caring is one of the most concerned issue these days. Some people believe that government should make laws about how people decide what to eat, while other thinks that is their personal choice. In this essay, I will look at both views and give my opinion about this problem.
First of all, there are reasons to think that government should make laws about the choice of food of people. The main reason is that nowadays, a lot of people have many diseases because of the food they eat. This can be explained by the fact that not many people care much about their diet. Since most of us are busy, fast food seem to be the best choice although it is pretty unhealthy. Knowing this fact, a lot of food companies have been lying about not only the calories of those food but also the ingredients. As a result, there are a lot cases of diabetes and heart disease nowadays compared to the past. This will increase the amount of money of governemnt to spend on that avoidable disease.
On the other hands, someone argues that they want to have their own diet without being affected by any laws. The first reason is that the status of everyone is different from each other. The government cannot provide everyone with a personal diet, and everyone cannot have the same diet too. For example, some patients have to eat many times in a day, but others are only able to eat once or twice a day. Or some people may have allergic to some kinds of food, while others do not. Were everyone be forced to have a similar diet, there would be many problems going on. I totally agree with this idea
In conclusion, I agree with those who think that everyone should choose food and nutritions on their own without any laws. Government should only provide some basic knowledge about eating to everyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'those foods'?
Suggestion: this food; those foods
...en lying about not only the calories of those food but also the ingredients. As a result, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54012345679 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13798459497 2.80592935109 76% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.5762487723 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.7222222222 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273236342173 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832241755379 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801552390941 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17908815311 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829572143207 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 12.4159519038 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.