Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from yo

Essay topics:

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experiences

Folk carnatic and all songs along with drama play, movies should be encouraged by politician. Thus essay explains how efficient folk songs influences the public and methods that government must ensure awareness of topic brought by drama play reaches the public.

Most importantly, I definitely agree that government is more involved in creating exhibitions including music shows and stage dramas. Significantly, they create awareness on focus area like deforestation, ban smoking through these art form to public. Also, state officials involve small drama artists to perform in festivals such as republic day, so that their message is conveyed via drama.
However, district officials create awareness camps on their area of interest by paintings exhibition. Their area of interest like land pollution would be sung as folk songs.

In contrast, I disagree on spending more funds in those areas, instead it can be used to implement law related to awareness and review whether message reaches public. Because it's common for public to ignore it. For instance if folk music mentions about issues of smoking. There could be ladies who hear songs and awareness it s not effective to active smokers

In conclusion, officials should fund money for folk music and dance which would enable state healtg mission to reach public in easier way. On the other hand, spending more would not give justice until law is implemented for awareness they wish to spread.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Folk carnatic and all songs along with d...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... topic brought by drama play reaches the public. Most importantly, I definitel...
^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at their message is conveyed via drama. However, district officials create aware...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'paintings'' or 'painting's'?
Suggestion: paintings'; painting's
...ness camps on their area of interest by paintings exhibition. Their area of interest like...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est like land pollution would be sung as folk songs. In contrast, I disagree o...
^^
Line 6, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... instead it can be used to implement law related to awareness and review whether ...
^^
Line 6, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess it s not effective to active smokers In conclusion, officials should fund mon...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 232.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28879310345 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59458055303 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650862068966 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1212418929 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127422884427 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462209616028 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381152172838 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666102479897 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351427631189 0.056905535591 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.