Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
The government has a wide of responsibilities, including enhancing people's lifestyles in different shapes like better healthcare, convenient transportation, job creation, and making better cities for the inhabitant to spend their leisure time. Some people argue that funding on art projects is obsolete, and the government should concentrate on public services that a wider range of population get benefits. I do not agree with the statement because inhabitants in cities nowadays need more facilities to enjoy their time and one of the ways is that music, theatre should become accessible for different people.
The growth in public services, without any doubt, is essential for inhabitants in populated cities for several reasons. First, if public service becomes accessible, it would quickly the price of them dropped down. For instance, if the government heavily invested in public transportation, more people persuade them to use this mode of transportation instead of using their car. Consequently, the traffic jam will reduce, and the cities become less polluted. Besides, healthcare is an issue for some populations. If the government invest in building more hospital and more insurance coverage, it would be probably more fruitful for the people. As a result, the broader public services in populated cities makes life much more comfortable and healthier.
However, the mode of transportation or better healthcare is essential for people; they need music and theatre as a source of enjoyment. Because living in cities is now stressful. Most people work more than usual hours to manage their expenses. So, as a government, it has some responsibility for their mental health. If the government makes more cinema, or fund more public concerts in which more people could enjoy from the music, it would eventually lead to a better lifestyle. If families have more access to arts, including musics, theatre, it will give them more joy in life. Therefore, the arts, as a source of enjoyment for inhabitants, couldn’t dismiss.
In sum, though public transportation, affordable healthcare are essential for inhabitants which should consider by the government while they plan for investment, it is crucial to look widely to incorporate an extension of an art project as well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41176470588 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07695399411 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53781512605 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 10.0 2.10420841683 475% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1976444727 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151741891399 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474329675363 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462695340663 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093883997674 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369759877587 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.