A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
In recent years, green movement have been risen sharply. This movement consider climate change, environment protection to safeguard planets for living of humans. In this respect, animal’s right is an issue in debate. Some argue that humans should respect animal right and even establish rules for them equal to human rights in which protect their exploitation, while other believe that humans must use animal as a source of food and research because they created to feed and cure them. in my opinion, animals in a danger should protect by law but some species like cow, sheeps, porks that could generate in mass production would be useful for human body to consume. In this essay, I outline both views in detail.
To begin with, it is confirmed that humans diminish species by hunting them illegally, and employ them for their benefits. Besides, it is submitted that ecosystem as a whole will be in danger if one species in a nature extinct. So that humans governments, particularly, who are in favor of animal’s right should draw a legislation for this purpose. Fortunately, nowadays, in many developed countries government construct a national park in which species monitor regularly. Also, hunting in developed countries is not easily as before and if somebody do it illegally they will face criminal offense. As a result, legislation for animal protection and awareness of government in recent years brings some hope for people to build up a better world for them.
However, animal rights should consider, it is undoubtedly some species would be beneficial for human body to feed them. it is now easily cows, porks, fishes or sheeps generates in a mass numbers with hands on technology. For instance, in United States more than four hundred thousand farm are registered to maintain this kind of animals. It becomes an industry in which animals nurture and at the certain level time they butchered and distributed natione wide in grocery stores. So that if animals would create by this kind of technology, consequently will not harm nature or even the species.
All in all, humans should maintain environment
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 492, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...use they created to feed and cure them. in my opinion, animals in a danger should ...
^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'somebody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...is not easily as before and if somebody do it illegally they will face criminal of...
^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...beneficial for human body to feed them. it is now easily cows, porks, fishes or sh...
^^
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... all, humans should maintain environment
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, however, if, so, while, for instance, kind of, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10601719198 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7163988724 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570200573066 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8885553119 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332371342014 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089189538421 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876217966682 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188262442595 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821147804711 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.