Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than expecting individuals to take responsibility. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Making the environment cleaner and controlling its further deterioration should be a joint effort of the administration and big corporate houses. Individuals alone cannot be held accountable for this damage. I accord with the statement and through this essay will bring forth the reason how the enforcement of environmental laws by the government and treating the waste material before disposing them off by the business houses can curb this problem.
The onus of cleaner environment lies greatly with the government as it is their responsibility to enforce stringent laws. This will not only help in mitigating the damage caused by pollution but also make the people aware and responsible of the rules and refrain them from disobeying the same. For example, authorities should make it a mandate that a prior approval from Centre or State Pollution Control Board is compulsory before setting up any industrial unit in the suburbs or rural areas. Hence, such a role played by the authorities would have a long-lasting impact on dealing with this problem.
Furthermore, the big organizations must ensure that all effluents and other waste material are segregated and treated before releasing them into the rivers. This will lead to reduction of pollutants in the air and water thereby leaving the environment cleaner. For example, Tata Group of Companies have an operational Solid Waste Management plant which treat the waste material within the premises thereby leaving the environment cleaner. Hence, big establishments should come forward with such plans of waste treatment which will eventually lead to a fresh and safe environment.
To conclude, the government should enforce the laws strictly with provision of penalising the law breaker and institutes should also come forward in contributing towards a greener and cleaner environment by setting up waste treatment plants in their premises.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44107744108 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95733702188 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0380550165 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171217784614 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065068197851 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340394181184 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107278058242 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319025725665 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.