Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
there are always some arguments that governments should consider the importance of railways funding instead of roads. I agree with the opinion given, because the rail system benefits both people and the environment.
A good reason that why railway funding should be high in the government agenda rather than roads is that since the train is cheaper than a personal car, numerous people are not able to afford the cost of buying and reserving a personal vehicle. Therefore, it is more beneficial for many layers of society who transmit frequently from different parts of the city or town to another place. Such as, employees who have to commute daily by public transportation.
another reason that providing fund for railways is more important than roads is, firstly, from the perspective of air contamination, when the amount of cars slips in the roads and the streets, it brings nothing but exhausted fumes. So, the air pollution increase greatly and cause many serious problems for animals and humans, for instance, some scarce animal species extinct or many different types of cancers like skin cancer. In terms of environment, the more cars, the more roads. In the other word, the people who are warden to expand the roads have to eradicate more forests and jungles where many species inhabit there and also they plants and their fauna is essential for balancing different ecosystems. By providing funds subways and trains which carry a greater amount of people and goods , governments can reduce the amount of roads.
In conclusion, railways system progression should be more fund in comparison with roads by governments and I strongly agree with this view because rail transportation is beneficial for both human survival and the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there are always some arguments that governme...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...guments that governments should consider the importance of railways funding inste...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...te daily by public transportation. another reason that providing fund for railway...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...transportation. another reason that providing fund for railways is more impo...
^^
Line 9, column 382, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
..., some scarce animal species extinct or many different types of cancers like skin cancer. In t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...terms of environment, the more cars, the more roads. In the other word, the peopl...
^^
Line 9, column 519, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...re roads. In the other word, the people who are warden to expand the roads have to era...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ord, the people who are warden to expand the roads have to eradicate more forests...
^^
Line 9, column 645, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'plant'
Suggestion: plant
...any species inhabit there and also they plants and their fauna is essential for balanc...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 803, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rry a greater amount of people and goods , governments can reduce the amount of ro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19649122807 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68696227136 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564912280702 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.0350520494 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.636363636 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170491674057 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068780152268 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698344510515 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134868992291 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587624923338 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.