It is argued that countries budgets should be allocate more budget on education than recreation and competitive games. It is strongly agreed that national budget should give more priority to the educational background like schools and universities than sports. On the other sides I believe that games and plays are also important for making educational mentality, that’s why I will like to make opinion on the both sides of the arguments.
There is myriad reason why governments have to make more budgets on education. One of them is investing on education is one of the best ways to improve countries economy for long time. For example, Korea and Finland invest a huge amount on education and they become highly benefited with lot of high-tech companies like Samsung, Nokia. Education is not only improving economic condition it also improving condition of a society. Education nations are more aware about social evil like drugs, alcohol, sexual health etc. For instance, Singapore educate their citizen about the danger of drug. Nowadays Singapore is the lowest drugged country all over the world.
On the flip side, Physical Sports and recreation must needed for healthy and happy nation team works, leadership etc. People can learn from games and sports. So, budgets on sports and recreation also needed for a nation.
In conclusion, I want to tell that governments should push the budgets on the education sides, but countries should make the nation aware about the necessity of sports and recreation as equally. It is recommended that governments continue to pump money into schools and universities in order to realise long-term goals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allocated'?
Suggestion: allocated
...argued that countries budgets should be allocate more budget on education than recreatio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: WILL_LIKE_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'would'?
Suggestion: would
...ducational mentality, that's why I will like to make opinion on the both sides ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23308270677 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67444148042 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563909774436 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8088256736 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256755292997 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859222400588 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762905375941 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158330135321 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712869806983 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.