Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this can not be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The most intellectual species in the world are the human. Due to there persistence and intellect, they brought about many technological advancement. This technological advancement has eased human lifestyle but it has adversely affected the environment at large. Some people are of the view that the damage cause by our advancement can never be reversed. I personally am of the opinion that with this technological advancement, if used in a proper way can definitely reverse the effects and bring about positive changes in the environment. This will make the planet a better place to live in.

Some people are in the opinion that its too late for reviving the damage done to the environment. Most of the plants and animals have already become extinct due to climatic changes that took place during the last few decades. Country like Japan after the world war effect is still suffering the consequences. The land still has got radio active elements present that prevent any life form. In India, the river Ganga which is regarded the pride of the country. Researcher are still trying to revive it purity. The River is still filled with poisonous chemical which adversely affected both the plant and fishes in it.
Due to extraction of Oil by many countries, the oceans have been polluted by the crude oil. This has affected the migrating birds and fishes in the ocean.

Many people and I are still in opinion that things can be done to revive the damage that was done. Countries are spending huge amount on creating wildlife sanctuaries to preserve the animals. Similarly, at many places where forest was cut, the government has taken necessary steps to revive the forest. Many countries have imposed strict rules and regulation on many industries like cement, sponge iron and steel by continuously monitoring the pollution emitting by them. These industries have to compulsory plant trees in their vicinity to maintain the ecological balance. Scientist are working on projects to generate energy from non conventional sources.

So in conclusion, we still have a chance to revive the earth and prevent the damage that is affecting the plant and animals around us. The task will be definitely be a challenge but if all countries together take a stand and help to preserve the nature, then in turn plant and animals will definitely benefit.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advancement seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much technological advancement', 'a good deal of technological advancement'.
Suggestion: much technological advancement; a good deal of technological advancement
...tence and intellect, they brought about many technological advancement. This technological advancement has eas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 436, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...this technological advancement, if used in a proper way can definitely reverse the effects and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, still, then, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0411311054 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70389118692 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542416452442 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0829227709 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2608695652 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9130434783 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.17391304348 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210162772061 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522333762163 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557265275153 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10454172678 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659708486497 0.056905535591 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.