Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this can not be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent years, the disadvantages of unplanned human activities on the biosphere have been gaining a great deal of attention around the world. It has become a bone of contention among the critics regarding the feasibility of reversing this damage to the nature. While some people consider recovering this substantial damage is totally impossible, however, I would contend that still there is a hope of protecting the endangered plant and animal kingdom.
On the one hand, it is inevitable that the biodiversity has been affected a lot by the human activity. This is because, as human, we always look for upgrading our life and sometimes for the sake of living a better life we endanger the lives of other animals. For example, for building our houses and for other purposes, we cut down trees and deforestation happen. Similarly, for getting food, mostly the proteins, we hunt and slaughter animals without considering the negatives to the nature. This results in the extinction of a lot of plants and animals from this planet. Moreover, owing to the lack of awareness, we do not think about the issues of reproducing those natural elements. Therefore, the declining of forest area, as well as animals, are being accelerated.
Conversely, while meeting the demand of food and habitats, we could take little steps for protecting the future. Therefore, tree plantation can be considered as a logical response against deforestation. At the same time, the governmental bodies may take initiatives to regain the biodiversity by the implementation of Conservation Act. Therefore, declaring different conservation area for wildlife can be the right approach to the endangered species. Furthermore, pressure on protein demand can be handled by developing artificial and synthesized protein in the laboratory. Finally, the awareness must be considered as a sine qua non for making this mission successful.
All things considered, we are on the brink of irreversible damage to our wildlife as well as forests. Personally, I believe that still, it is possible to bring back the nature to her original condition.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, still, therefore, well, while, as for, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26409495549 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08985442705 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593471810089 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6565374281 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216410322368 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614790982534 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405482096033 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112603696532 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453271701532 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.