Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both and give your opinion.
From ancient time, plants and animals had been affected by an individual's action. This cannot be changed is thought by some people; however, measures can be in use to bring a change in this viewpoint is thought by other demographics. In this essay, I am going to discuss the notions, and also I want to give my own views.
Although, humans are the wonderful creation of nature and fully independent to do any work my own, they still reliant upon plants and animals to survive on this earth. Even though, they sell them for money and make their business lucrative such as selling wood and skin of crocodiles and many other animals. Hence, the consumption of natural sources increased with passing over time. For instance, the primitive man used plants and animals to fulfil their basic needs, nowadays, the current situation is going worse. Not only has he used these animals on a wide range to decorate their houses, but also for fashion.
Still, it is curbing by preserving forest areas and prohibit hunting animals. If people are banned to go into these areas, then we can save animals and woods. Along with this, the government should make rigid laws against the smuggler of animals. Moreover, the education system should improve, and environmental study is considered a compulsory subject in school and other educational institutes. For example, the government of India banned hunting tigers in 2000. Besides this lawmaker made rigid rules against its hunt. So, currently, there are so many tigers now, which have been saved by the government till now by making this protocol.
In conclusion, while people vary with their viewpoints, I strongly agree with that the solutions can be providing by the government to protect these from human activities such as protect and put a ceiling on areas for animals and plants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...plants and animals had been affected by individuals action. This cannot be changed is thoug...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ome people; however, measures can be in use to bring a change in this view point is...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, while, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94805194805 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48750461385 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626623376623 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3002138516 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214511535602 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05815722478 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060784978118 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137171725088 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845180033542 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.