The impact that the growing demand for more flights has had on the environment is a major concern for many countries. Some people believe that one way to limit the number of people travelling by air is to increase the tax on flights.
To what extent do you think this could solve the problem?
Aviation is considered to be responsible for the emission of greenhouse gases in large proportions. Many think that the government should increase the tax slab on air travel to discourage people and make them think twice while booking an air ticket. I think it will be of little help as dependence on this mode of transport is higher than ever.
Levying more taxes on air travel will have a little impact, as this facility is mostly used by rich people, therefore, money is not a problem for a large portion of the population who use this facility. Although, some middle-class people travel by air, as in emergency there is no faster mode of transportation. Moreover, due to globalization, the number of flights operating is increasing each year therefore high fares will have a marginal impact on this booming industry.
So, the government should invest the tax money collected from airfares in curbing pollution generated by aeroplanes. For instance, planting trees in the vicinity of the airport to absorb obnoxious gases and sound pollution.
In addition, usage of alternate less polluting jet fuels should be encouraged because the jet fuel commonly used is not very efficient and it produces a lot of residue gases.
In conclusion, it is almost impossible to cut the number of people who aeroplane for travel even if the fare is raised. Therefore, the only method to decrease environmental degradation by the aviation industry is to use the money generated by additional taxes in planting more trees and using more efficient biofuels.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 68, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a aeroplane'.
Suggestion: who is a aeroplane
... impossible to cut the number of people who aeroplane for travel even if the fare is raised. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08235294118 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91366479234 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580392156863 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8876110936 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.818181818 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22499563619 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080890878723 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600193558684 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109189774428 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712257702277 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.