An increasing number of people now prefer to go shopping in supermarkets rather than small shops and local markets. Is this a positive or negative development?
It has been noticed in recent times that people choose supermarkets over small shops and markets in the vicinity for shopping. I believe though shopping in supermarkets offers advantage of less time consumption, the disadvantage of fall in revenue of local business cannot be overlooked.
Shopping in the supermarket is beneficial than shops in local markets in terms of time saving. Everything, from clothes to grocery and home appliances to cosmetics, can be obtained from the shopping malls. Wall Mart is good paradigm of this where all the utilities can be purchased under a single roof, buyers need not to roam here and there for buying various products. They can, substantially, spare their plenty of time which can be utilized in other productive works. In contrast, in the small shops and markets, users are bound to visit at different shops for buying products for their day-to-day affairs.
Inclination of locals towards supermarkets is undoubtedly affecting local vendors negatively. Business of the native shopkeepers has been dwindled drastically which is cause of lock down several outlets. Hence, they are unemployed as well as suffering to make both ends meet. In my hometown, this year sales of local vendors fell drastically by 50% and many locals shops has been observed close. On the other hand, Big bazaar, a well known shopping mall, accounted ever increase in sales. Thus, it is apparent how supermarkets are affecting adversely to the local shops and markets.
In conclusion, despite the benefit of time to people by shopping in supermarket, drawback of reduced sales as well as shutting down of local business are too dire to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'roam'?
Suggestion: roam
...ed under a single roof, buyers need not to roam here and there for buying various produ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, thus, well, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17777777778 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83052148055 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9318954854 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8571428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306474997773 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112924616368 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853955542689 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187077410639 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236973257536 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.