International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. What are your opinions on this?
Nowadays, tourism industry becomes more popular among all the residents of the globe. It is sometimes argued that the positive aspects of this trend by far outweigh the negative ones. I believe that this is a positive scheme and could bring advantages for nations.
There are various possible reasons why I believe international tourism would be beneficial for countries. Firstly, tourism industry creates more job opportunities for local people and consequently brings more income and funds for them. Secondly, it encourages the governments and wealthy individuals to invest in this area and this issue will improve the social welfare and enhance the quality of life in these sites. Finally, countries can introduce their culture, custom and traditions to other people all over the world and this would be a positive propaganda for the host country. To prove my claim, I can refer to an article having been published in Times magazine, indicates that the number of tourists who are interested in visiting countries which are rich in history but are not developed has been increased up to 30% in recent years.
On the other hand, the negative impacts of expansion of international tourism should not be neglected. Due to the popularity of tourism, countries made more constructions such as hotels, roads, restaurants and the like that spoiled the natural habitats of animals and mitigate the unspoiled areas. Besides, tourists produce a large amount of litter and rubbish which is not recycled and is a threat to the nature. Furthermore, the expansion of tourism would cause some traditional jobs to be died out such as farming, fishing and weaving carpets. A recent research in Michigan University reveals that more than 100 traditional jobs in local areas are superseded by modern vocations.
To conclude, although the international tourism brings some detrimental effects for countries, it could enhance the average level of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: Recent research
...s farming, fishing and weaving carpets. A recent research in Michigan University reveals that mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27419354839 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81169143771 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587096774194 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0918013576 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.785714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22005953568 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753261006132 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413317294312 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13486880476 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408122265789 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.