In the last century, the first man to walk on the moon said it was "a giant leap for mankind”. However, some people think it
has made little difference to our daily lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
To a certain extent I agree that human could achieve a great success by stepping on Moon Which was something extraordinary at that time. however, I also believe that there was not explicit positive effects on people's lives.
There are various reasons why I would argue that the impacts of this achievement was not vivid in individuals' life. Firstly, these kinds of projects are very expensive and government have to provide expenditures by spending taxing money; however, people believe that this should be spend on public services such as building hospitals or schools. Training professional workforce
and scientists as well as providing necessary equipment will cost millions of dollars. Secondly, these are vanity projects for politicians and they try to accomplish these projects to arise their popularity in society. A particular salient example of this is the Carter who was the president of USA at that time and this progress in science boosted his popularity up to 40%. Finally, The smallest technological error would cost scientists their lives.
On the other hand, there have been positive arguments in favor of this great human experience. It is clear now that life is feasible on other planets such as Pluto, Moon and the like. Furthermore, this prosperity opens doors to new ideas and experiences about our future life; consequently, scientists invent very well equipped shuttles and space crafts in which human and robots
can send signals to the earth and leads to better investigations. To support my claim, I can refer to an article having been published in Times magazine, indicates that human's data about space have been almost doubled during the past 10 years.
In conclusion, although the scientists' effort was not futile and leaded to better triumph in space projects, the importance of public service and welfare for the residents of the globe should not be neglected. If government take steps to make world a better place to live, there will be no need for human to live on other planets in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...s something extraordinary at that time. however, I also believe that there was not expl...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...ver, people believe that this should be spend on public services such as building hos...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...schools. Training professional workforce and scientists as well as providing nece...
^^^
Line 6, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d space crafts in which human and robots can send signals to the earth and leads ...
^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ished in Times magazine, indicates that humans data about space have been almost doubl...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
...0 years. In conclusion, although the scientists effort was not futile and leaded to bet...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10479041916 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72046973405 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589820359281 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8988401796 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.785714286 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0874313059569 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336086938449 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369598825138 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0497257924168 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506255226595 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.