There are many who believe that the advantages of Moon exploration has brought into their lives is insufficient to justify its expense. While there are valid reasons to ask this question, the overall scientific effect is all-encompassing.
On the one hand, one of the reasons to decry the wasted resources directed towards space program is the lack of clear benefits in the short run. Sending astronomers into the outer space or onto the Moon in particular and investing in expensive telescopes does not immediately and apparently improve a person’s living standard or create an extra income source for an average individual. Many will reckon it is more rational and effective to invest this amount of money into advancing the medical and educational system, or to upgrade the public infrastructure, from which they can see an obvious and more direct impact on their life quality. For example, millions of dollars saved from cutting unnecessary spending in astronomy can be used to increase the number of beds and nurses in hospitals, saving more people’s lives.
On the other hand, the scientific influence of the discovery of the Moon can be positively significant, even though it may take a long time to be clearly seen. Exploring the moon is just the foundation for mankind’s effort in trying to study the universe, which can be crucial for human’s sustainability. Discovering the Moon in particular and the outer space in general can help human predict potential risk threatening lives on Earth, such as a meteorite striking our planet or find out a planet that is analogous to the Earth so that human can move there in case the Earth comes to its end some day. For instance, thanks to the rock and soil brought back since the first time a man landed on the Moon, scientists can determine what are the critical elements for lives to exist on a planet, along with this come different solutions to protect these elements on the Earth to protect human’s lives. This doesn't benefit people at this stage, but one day mankind may have to thank science for that.
All in all, far from being a waste of invaluable resources, space exploration has been one of the driving forces of the continued progress of humanity and hence it should receive more support.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 905, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he Earth to protect human’s lives. This doesnt benefit people at this stage, but one d...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, hence, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in general, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93733681462 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75008482565 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579634464752 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.0416537187 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.583333333 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9166666667 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124483339695 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446412064956 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414610812166 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580572197717 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545620840913 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.