In recent times, technology advancements have made it feasible for many tasks to be performed by artificial intelligence, including education. Even though it is undeniable that there are things machines can do better than human, such as calculating sequences of large numbers, I reckon it is unlikely that human teachers will be completely superseded by them because of some mankind's abilities that machines can hardly mimic. In addition, there are some alternatives to attending classes physically, one of which is online classes.
To begin with, despite the speed and accuracy that artificial intelligence can achieve in providing knowledge, there are essential skills of a teacher that it is not currently capable of doing to a high standard as human can, such as creativity and judgements. The reason why robots or "smart" devices cannot be as innovative as human is because the developments in machine learning have only reached the level where it allows for machines to self-learn and copy actions from other devices, not to create new ones outside what it was "taught" to do. For instance, although scientists have invented some robots that can draw pictures, it is soon obvious that the diversity and combination of the colors are far from being as vibrant and aesthetic as those of man-made, because the robots were just programmed to draw simple strokes with basic colors. Besides, artificial intelligence is also not very efficient in judging situations and making decisions, because these sometimes require sophisticated combinations of emotions and profound knowledge, which may take years to develop. Human teachers in contrast, have been trained professionally to make fair judgements in essential situations, such as assessing whether a student's conduct is morally wrong or not, or whether a student has been diligent and deserves a high participation mark.
Additionally, an option apart from joining classes in person is to register for online classes. There are many popular websites these days where a person can find a relevant course, ranging from Arts to Computer Science, Business, etc from any university across the world and study remotely, such as Edx, Coursera, Udemy. Learners do not have to be a student in that university to register for those classes, and they can still earn a certification if they pass the tests. Sometimes, these courses come with a registration fee for a few hundred dollars, but sometimes they are free and people only have to pay a lower amount for the test if they want a certification. Lecturers will deliver the lectures totally online and most of the time these were pre-recorded and students will do the tasks as required to complete the course. This type of learning is becoming a commonplace, especially during Covid-19 when most schools are closed down due to social distancing requirements.
All in all, while artificial intelligence can outperform mankind in some fields, I strongly believe that it cannot replace a human teacher, especially in the foreseeable future as there are crucial skills that it still cannot master. There are also some replacements for physical classes, such as online courses, where students can study at their own pace and choose any subjects they prefer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...se the developments in machine learning have only reached the level where it allows ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, so, still, while, apart from, for instance, i reckon, in addition, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2756.0 1615.20841683 171% => OK
No of words: 522.0 315.596192385 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27969348659 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.20363070211 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99923410804 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 176.041082164 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549808429119 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 882.0 506.74238477 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.9231323209 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.25 106.682146367 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.625 20.7667163134 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124280588258 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409990359642 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288383352907 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757974287983 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123922625849 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 78.4519038076 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.