The internet will never replace traditional course books in schools. How far do you agree with this prediction?
There is numerous changes to existing method of teaching in schools for past few decades. Absolutely, coursebooks are enriched with international syllabus and they are available in mobile Applications in Android, hence its not mandatory to refer internet to get inputs.
It is clear that school curriculum has been monitored and they are under continuous assessment or Examinations. Each exam result pave the way for their academic achievement. Based on result, they are enhanced for further education or higher education. Firstly, with the advent of modern teaching with smart boards, it makes less teacher led and more on autonomous or self learning. Significantly, This teaches study skills such as independent research and synthesizing sources rather than rote learning. Also, courses are supervised by teachers also via Pearson Mobile apps and they provide information in audio, video formats and self study games. This aids student to obtain more inputs on course books as they are more inclined to multimedia information. Students are also requested to participate in the International exam which gives them exposure to variety of information. Hence, internet is used for data gathering or collection of information related to coursebook. But, it would be teacher led process by guided learning.
On contrast, Internet is vast ocean of knowledge which is used by adults for distance learning or self study course. Additionally, they are able to discriminate between sources and sift information to marshal facts. Most importantly, they filter details from various websites and collect important information related to their topic area. Obviously, this is matured method of reading and schools student are unaware of this methodology. Student may refer Internet sources for their project work or to enrich their knowledge apart from academic education like evolution of dinosaurs, or educational games. Also, this would be under constant supervision by parents or enabled with antivirus that would be locked to access only children websites.
In conclusion, Course books are often updated internationally with quality and depth of material and it is an integral part of the syllabus. So, the internet can be occasionally referred under teacher or parent supervision only.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is numerous changes to existing me...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are numerous changes'?
Suggestion: There are numerous changes
There is numerous changes to existing method of teaching in schoo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ory to refer internet to get inputs. It is clear that school curriculum has b...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cher led process by guided learning. On contrast, Internet is vast ocean of k...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to access only children websites. In conclusion, Course books are often up...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, apart from, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53428571429 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95465734054 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582857142857 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1702983624 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.85 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 3.4128256513 410% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118168497152 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346627892802 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03583041431 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799434413044 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223068841591 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.