It is better to be a member of a group than to be a leader of a group. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Being a captain is invariably more stressful than to be a crew member of a ship due to the increased accountability and performance pressure. Therefore, this essay agrees that a non-leadership position is far better than a leadership role.
In terms of job responsibilities, an individual member is less stressed about their performance compared to a leader of a group. Apparently, whereas the leader has to handle multiple departments ranging from managing people to rules and regulations, a member, on the other hand, just has to follow the procedures dictated by the upper management. Since the leader has to tackle numerous issues, the concomitant is usually on the higher side than any other group member. For instance, in a cricket team, the team captain’s responsibilities involve choosing the right players for a game, creating a game strategy, so the concomitant stress associated with captaincy is extremely high. Due to less pressure, it is a better idea to a crewmember instead of controlling a ship’s wheel.
In addition to this, leaders have a high risk of being in the limelight in case of failure. As a leader is seen as a mission director, when significant milestones remain unfulfilled, the leader is held responsible even if that is a result of an inefficient team effort. The launch of Rohini satellite is a classic example of such a scenario. During the satellite launch, a malfunction went unnoticed by a scientist that resulted in the failure of this launch; however, Dr Sarabhai, the mission director, was defamed by the media even though it was not his fault. So, if one wants to remain on a safe side, it is better to be a follower than a leader.
To conclude, owing to less stressful responsibilities as well as the advantage of not attracting everyone’s attention when it comes to position, a non-leader is better than a leader.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, as to, for instance, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01923076923 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22029743686 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9666483851 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.461538462 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307753334255 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10308839614 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788723175218 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169799816442 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406295621533 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.