It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The history of a country gives useful information about its present. Teachers teach children about the history which helps them to know the evolution of countries. However, it is thought that learning of the local history is more important than the global history for students. I partially disagree with the belief because the global knowledge gives a better understanding to children about the development of other countries.
The knowledge of the local history is crucial for schoolchildren to get the exposure of the evolvement of their country. The traditions, cultures, and the hard times would tell students about the lifestyle of the ancient people. Besides, taking children to museums and historical places would give useful information of the past to them. For instance, Schools in India teach students about the country’s history and take them to historic monuments, which is an add-on to their theortical knowledge of the past. Consequently, schoolchildren would recognize their country’s growth and development, and the struggling phase of the ancient people.
Nevertheless, the world history is vital for students in order not to remain unknown about many information and facts. The global history would help them know how nations grew and developed. It would also tell about diverse cultures and traditions of different countries. Therefore, schoolchildren would have a zeal to travel to other states to experience various values. To illustrate, Cambridge school in London takes their students to different countries every year to show museums and monuments of the past times.
To conclude, it is essential for children to know about the local history to regard the country’s cultrues and values. However, the world history is significant for children as it gives an intensed knowledge about many nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...ts in order not to remain unknown about many information and facts. The global histo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46830985915 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92700955644 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475352112676 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4487448484 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.0625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319175401209 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119951400614 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11066701571 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220333367769 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807119049353 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.