It is not necessary to have access to the Internet to live a full life.
What is your opinion?
One of the trends that have been the subject of debate among people is the necessity of internet access to live a full life. Although it seems that modernization has rendered older ways obsolete and is forcing the majority of people to practice new methods, people have conflicting views about the aforementioned subject. In this essays, both sides of this argument, including my view on the subject will be comprehensively discussed.
The critiques believe the most significant disadvantages of the internet is that it promotes the solitary life and forces the users to distant themselves from a healthy social life. They argue that internet is addictive and prevents people from natural interaction with others. Take online social networks as an example, people spend so much time in these virtual social media that they forget how to talk to a human being eye to eye. Another convincing explanation for disagreeing with the ever-growing use of the internet is that it makes people indolent and prevent them from committing to their responsibilities. Like students that disregard their homework and spend their valuable time on surfing the internet.
On the other hand, many people, myself included, believe the advantages of internet access are so important that it is almost vital in the era in which we live. The fact that using the internet is more convenient is undeniable. For example, online shopping terminates the unnecessary activities such as traveling a distance and the headache of rush hour and traffic congestion to buy a product, hence, this saved time can be considered an improvement of life quality. Moreover, internet access is an essential necessity of modern scientific research. In the past, scientists and grad students had to spend months in libraries and archives in order to find the content they needed. Thanks to the internet, this time has decreased to few weeks if not hours.
In conclusion, on the basis of the points mentioned above, it would seem that the benefits of internet access outweigh the risks to a degree that makes it a vital part of our lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ws about the aforementioned subject. In this essays, both sides of this argument, in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 730, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...o the internet, this time has decreased to few weeks if not hours. In conclusio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09565217391 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84780801705 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568115942029 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4886743497 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.2 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215615515572 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753252174374 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829958067285 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123225313881 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373210332465 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.