It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important?
Preserving wildlife and tackling a variety of problems in our society such as education or healthcare are among one of the most fiercely debated issues. While I agree that state budget should be used to protect wild animals, I would like to argue that the government should also spend funds solving other issues in our everyday life.
On the one hand, it is believed that the central authorities should allocate national fund for wildlife preservation. Firstly, there is an array of endangered animals which are on the verge of extinction. Without money funded for protection, those animals will die out, which has a negative impact on our ecological balance. For instance, the disappearance of one species will result in the collapse of the others, including human whose living depends on it. Additionally, some people regard conserving wild animals is one kind of preserving the beauty and diversity of our earth. It is the variety of fauna that contributes vastly to scientific research. In short, protecting wildlife is also protecting people’s life.
On the other hand, I agree that state fund should be used for tackling problems in our society because it is education, healthcare and the like that affects directly our life. Without knowledge and a healthy body, mankind could not develop. For instance, in Africa, it is illiteracy and epidemics that prevents the development of the countries, in contrast to the USA, a mighty nation with standard services. That is the reason why better education and heath care quality mean higher standard of living.
Additionally, money should be spent on such problems as environmental pollution. Nowadays, contamination is among the most pressing problems as it has damaged our surroundings and caused perilous diseases for people.
In conclusion, the government should take wildlife and other problems in the society into consideration as these factors all have a great impact on our life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in short, kind of, such as, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23717948718 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89231877385 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9306521826 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.125 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118640843806 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374847067139 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463829985815 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794679997719 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038604186093 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.