It is predicted that robots are going to become increasingly important in our lives. How could robots be used in the future? Will this development be a positive or a negative development?
It is forecasted that robots machines are going to become progressively significant in our lives. According to my point of view, these electronic robots be functioned in the future as a helping hand in day to day activities whether it is an organization or in homes, which is an advantage in the growth.
These automatic robots will provide assistance daily either for office use or in house, what I mean by this is that roles and responsibilities in dealing with the task will be quicker than man. In addition to this, it will also reduce the chances of error in work as well as efficiency will be increased. The so-called labor union culture will have vanished completely from the institutions and no conflicts in the decision making between the families, while performing house chores or errands. Therefore, I believe that this type of future is expected in the upcoming years.
On the other hand, the working style of big robots leads to positive evolution. The reason behind this is that the lifestyle of the people will be quicker as compared to yesterdays. Traveling to the countries would be easier and faster which will save time and the cost of opportunity. Furthermore, the feeding program one time to the robots device will reduce the manpower in every sector and the chance of success in research’s work will be more productive and authenticated. These are the causes we can say which are beneficial for fostering growth.
In conclusion, these robots will work as a supporting function in ongoing activities, whereas this is the positive progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...lifestyle of the people will be quicker as compared to yesterdays. Traveling to th...
^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'robots'' or 'robot's'?
Suggestion: robots'; robot's
...re, the feeding program one time to the robots device will reduce the manpower in ever...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, while, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95437262357 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89405320572 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574144486692 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6175551284 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.583333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31548313618 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11426323491 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575871044319 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188688048309 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190308345461 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.