It is said that travel broadens the mind. What can we learn by traveling to other countries?
Should we first explore our own countries?
The dynamics of the world have changed largely with globalization. It is a common perception among the public that traveling around the world remarkably enhances the life experiences of travelers. They can learn about demographics, culture, tradition, religions, and many new places.
Undoubtedly, traveling to different countries provide practical new life experiences to people. They get to know about citizens of different countries and what norms and believes they follow which are unknown to travelers. Subsequently, they can learn many new things which can be used in their lifestyle to ameliorate their living. Yoga, for instance, was unknown in many countries until people visited China, Thailand, and Japan. People discovered and experienced new ways of exercise which became a trend in the world.
It is desirable for people to travel abroad while their own country is undiscovered to them which is more probably cheaper as compared to foreign trips. There are many rich cultural countries where local nationals can find new traditions and places to visit which are quite new to them. It would be at least in their budget and they can experience many things to fulfill the purpose of traveling. Rather illustrative examples are India and Pakistan where a large number of cultures can be found. It is much affordable for their citizens to travel inside the countries to explore new places rather than abroad.
The conclusion to be drawn is that people learn a lot about different regions and their cultures which provide amazing life experiences. It is much affordable for people to explore their own countries as there are many places which are unknown to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... to them which is more probably cheaper as compared to foreign trips. There are ma...
^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...gs to fulfill the purpose of traveling. Rather illustrative examples are India and Pak...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e examples are India and Pakistan where a large number of cultures can be found. It is much affor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, at least, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23333333333 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7528486306 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.7361961305 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.2 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188934332211 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729914445955 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508136754235 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123167364784 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359865350429 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.