it is seen that people are earning higher salaries which is good for country but some believe that their salaries must be reduced, discuss both views and give your opinion
It has observed in few countries that people are earning enormously higher salaries which is good for a country while some believe that authorities must control salaries by limiting the amount they earn. In my opinion, it is good for a country because these people do their work either in the economic field or in the medicinal field.
On one hand, taking control of salaries is important because this problem for organisations in either fulfilling their demands or satisfying others with same or increased one. Secondly, it raises conflicts between employees destroying the peaceful nature, while this could be solved by about the most desired one. Another reason would be political people who are earning high income but not satisfying the needs of the people who is creating an opposed behavior towards them with people demanding to either remove the person or cutoff salary. In these matters salaries to be considered those who are dedicating their work for the country.
On the other hand, taking these points into consideration higher level work such as new inventions which is increasing the economic value of the country or saving people through their medical work. These people are paid higher by the government in the form of appraisal by scrutinizing their significance. Though, these work positively for the sake of bringing changes in developing their country and helping others for their betterment. so, in my belief i think their salaries must be raised for their work and dignity shown towards people.
To end, work done effectively and properly for the needs of the people or for the government must be valued by raising salaries and supervision must be done for the unreliable person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onomic field or in the medicinal field. On one hand, taking control of salaries ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...nd helping others for their betterment. so, in my belief i think their salaries mu...
^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... for their betterment. so, in my belief i think their salaries must be raised for...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, while, i think, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10357142857 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62036763272 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532142857143 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.370211051 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.909090909 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39607415457 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16444706693 0.084324248473 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105335768465 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270303846242 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103366523934 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.