It is waste of money and time to research on past; it is important to study the issues of a present which affect the world.
agree or disagree?
In this rapidly changing world, money and resources are a vital part of the growth. To become extravagant on material or research which could not yield a profit is wastage of time and effort.people are often debating to invest money on researching past or to curb out current challenges. Both sides have their own merits and demerits. If something can search out based on the past then it becomes a breakthrough else it incurs a huge loss. Hence, it is inevitable to take a succinct and prudent step in order to foresee a future.
There are innumerable reasons to do research on past such as researching on old-ancient civilization, collecting old weather data of thousand years, research on extinct species etc. Each of them has an advantage. For instance, Working on weather data of several thousand years proffer the pattern which gives the analytical support to understand the current situation of the atmosphere. Thus, investing resources can a helpful to predict the environmental impacts on the earth. Another inarguable advantage is the understanding of the cultural existence and heritage. Allocating the money to the study of the archaeological activities can proliferate the knowledge of architecture engineers. As a consequence, they can create new building which could be the amalgamation of modern and ancient structure. Hence, it is mandatory to spend a proportional amount of money and time on past.
on the other hand, the world is facing myriad challenges; namely globalization, pollution, a plague of morbid diseases. Therefore, it is necessary to invest money to counter the detrimental effect of issues. for example, allocate resources on the issue of climate change are absolutely required to sustain the eco-system. Working on the issue of traffic management can curb the air-pollution. Researching on the roots of morbid diseases also succor to find a solution or vaccine. Aforementioned reasons illustrate the motto behind widening resources on present challenges.
In conclusion, magnify the resources on the past are as important as the present. However, to give significant time and resources on current problems can bring the development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...des have their own merits and demerits. If something can search out based on the p...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...al amount of money and time on past. on the other hand, the world is facing myr...
^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...unter the detrimental effect of issues. for example, allocate resources on the issu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34693877551 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1878143491 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565597667638 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3412877972 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262724345421 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624331281007 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610447527804 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148134817932 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231475180366 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.