It is rightly said that the way you speak defines your personality. Some people believe that it is utmost important to speak well in public, and present yourself appropriately. Thus, this skill should be taught in schools. This essay will explore constructive arguments to support the above notion.
Undeniably, speaking is the most powerful tool of communication. One cannot express his or her emotions without speaking aptly, which could be a severe disadvantage in various professions. Politicians, for instance, will not be able to connect to an audience if this skill is lacking. Moreover, the person feels confident when he or she communicates flawlessly and vice-versa. Showcasing yourself by speaking fluently enhances the social capability of the person. It is observed that people who speak more are more social and extrovert in comparison to people who believe in less exchange of words.
Admittedly, schools act as a base for shaping the child's growth; therefore, communication training should be a part of the curriculum. Also, it is not that straightforward, as a result, educated staff is required to engrave this skill in to the students. In addition to this, children learn from practice and school can conduct various competitions such as debate, so that children can participate and understand its basic principles. According to researches, schools are the best platform to make children learn anything.
In conclusion, speaking confidently is important and requires a great deal of effort, and cannot be learned in a day or two, but daily practice in schools with other children can help achieve the target swiftly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32692307692 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06500335434 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619230769231 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7439924304 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312592214911 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087748021996 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936912254385 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172305464956 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739848228195 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.