In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by fast food. This has a negative impact on families, individuals and society.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The booming trend of eating junk food has taken over the place of traditional food in numerous nations which has adverse affects on families, individuals and community as a whole. This essay firmly advocates the notion since, firstly, cultural erosion is promoted by the same and secondly, encouraging an unhealthy lifestyle of a person.
Initiating with the foremost reason, foods related to one’s own tradition has an advantage that by eating it, people still remain closer to their roots and ethics. However, if fast food is in taken which is always a cuisine originating from abroad, people end up getting attracted towards the culture of that country as they get an urge to explore more about other areas of that region. This can be illustrated from the article of Travel India Blog which revealed that food has been the most alluring factor in proliferating the rate of tourists. Thereby, forgetting one’s own culture that will make them distant from family members and eventually, from community too.
Apart from this, substitution of traditional food can be detrimental in terms of health of an individual since junk food is lower in nutritional value and higher in unwanted components leading to unhealthy food consumption of people. Even, many are found to be prone to diseases such as obesity, indigestion, liver disorders etcetera which can further create other problems. The best instance would be the alarming rate of obesity among Americans as per the reports of WHO and its major factor is the consumption of handy food they buy from food outlets. Hence, fast food has that ability to ruin the total health of a person.
To reiterate, it can be said that undoubtedly, fast food has offered convenience and taste, but its repercussions are long term as people get lured towards other culture and also, making them unhealthy. Thus, I would suggest its intake in times of need only.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...d taste, but its repercussions are long term as people get lured towards other cultu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02848101266 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65589673254 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591772151899 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.8868293072 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.416666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258027458776 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938651016753 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618133938624 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153563771714 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061317780243 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.