In many countries in the world, some people earn extremely high salaries.Some people think that this is good for a country. Others think that the government should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

In many countries in the world, some people earn extremely high salaries.

Some people think that this is good for a country. Others think that the government should not allow

salaries above a certain level.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In many parts of the world, some people are receiving a hefty amount of money as remunerations. It is often argued by some that it is justified because it portrays the image of a country’s recognition for hard work. Meanwhile, others still claim that wages should not exceed above a specified range by the government for equal monetary distribution among all. This essay will explore both sides of the argument before drawing a logical opinion.

On the one hand, supporters of high salaries believe that this way results in a good reputation of the country. If high wages were given to people, it would attract talented and hardworking people from all over the world, which results in the prosperity of the country. Take an example of private organizations in Norway, which are famous for giving high wages, where competition is high because thousands of people apply for the job each year, and almost half of the workforce consists of foreign employees. Thus, giving a huge amount is to an extent beneficial for nations.

On the other hand, the advocates of the view that governmental authorities should limit salaries believe in the circulation of money among all classes. Since an extremely high salary would increase polarity among the upper and lower class, resulted in chaos and anarchy in society. For instance, in Bangladesh, where managers were getting heavy wages, while blue-collar workers were getting a negligible amount of money, which was the sole reason for the birth of loathing for the upper class. Hence, governmental elites should put a bar on higher salaries.

However, from my perspective, nations can benefit a lot in terms of better reputation in the world, but this would increase the gap between wealthy, and poor segments of society which further creates social problems.

To sum up, even though high salaries are effective for countries and attract people from the world over, but I believe the government should put a limit on extremely high wages in order to maintain a balance among all.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, still, thus, while, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09226190476 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6870237014 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556547619048 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4148265358 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.214285714 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30750017211 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100070050971 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471681930293 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160831110006 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733740305392 0.056905535591 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.