Many employers are employing people with good social skills as well as good qualifications. Do you agree or disagree that good social skills is as important as good qualifications to succeed in job?
There is no denying that the way a candidate is hired in an organisation has changed drastically. Despite the academic proficiency which a person possess, an individual is also required to have good interpersonal skills in order to attain a successful career. I agree with the argument, and the essay will discuss the opinion in detail.
At the onset, those who believe that social skills are important in an employee might argue that these people are effective communicators. This is because they have confidence in what they speak and can efficiently address their ideas to large audience. For example, people with better presentation skills often gets platform to represent his company in global conferences. Also, participation in such events gives a person edge over other fellow workers at the workplace. In contrast, if there is a worker who has lack of confidence, may witness a slow progression in his job.
Furthermore, an employee with great soft skills finds it easy to get a job. The reason for this is attributed to the art of maintaining public relations. For instance, many people are given employment offers from their clients because of their excellent networking skills. This not only gives a new direction to profession, but also ensures financial growth. Moreover, if a person is inadequate in these skills, then he may struggle to have grab job opportunities.
In conclusion, although academic excellence plays a vital role in a workplace, an employee should also focus on improving his social skills as well. I firmly believe that a combination of both these qualities are important for leading favourable results in job.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17164179104 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98734055789 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623134328358 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0702125152 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.4 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204518071529 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536562047446 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492783056764 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110394801236 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00999526169351 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.