Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women.
To what extent do you agree?
Over a period, we have seen a significant increase in the number of women being employed by companies. Many of these organisations are driving the inclusion agenda to bring about gender equality at work. Though we see an overall increase in female employees, we still see a disparity at executive levels, as these are still dominated by men.
Since ages, women have been associated with domestic chores and family responsibilities which has undergone a transitional change, we see more females taking up office jobs. However, some people still have not been able to change their ideology and have not accepted females at leadership roles. They are of the belief that women need to adhere to family calls, as such they are not able to attend meetings during late hours, take up additional responsibilities or accept transferrable jobs. To force in equality, companies have started building leadership roles that are dedicated for females. This mandates companies to groom and hire deserving female employees and help them contribute towards the company’s profitability.
However, allocations should not eclipse the importance of calibre and merit. It is imperative to give opportunities to deserving candidates which should not be influenced by caste, gender, creed or colour. Organisations can run forums to groom female employees, but it should not be mandated to hire basis their gender. For example, Accenture has started a leadership DNA agenda that identifies females of high calibre at various levels, trains them for the next level and promotes inhouse talent development. This has resulted in workforce diversity at higher positions. Such change will also bring about a sense of equality and competitiveness amongst the masses.
To conclude, reservations only act as a favour which can be used irrationally by many, to avoid such instances it is important to open doors of opportunities equally to males and females. To bring about a change in the thought process of some individuals, there can be trainings for all the employees, bringing about a change in the work culture and growth for all.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28783382789 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01851746163 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560830860534 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0563161249 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115627278889 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389696107709 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243728270106 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066394507634 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270974049995 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.