Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
In many nations around the world, there are many galleries showcasing historical and cultural artifacts without charging any money to the visitors. While offering free visits to such sites has certain advantages, there are certain disadvantages worth considering.
The primary advantage by offering free entry to museums would be creating widespread awareness about local culture by attracting a large number of local visitors and international tourist. Additional, this phenomenon would also enable educating the youth who are increasingly attracted to pop culture and are in danger of losing their cultural identity. Therefore, such subsides can be justified as they showcase cultural heritage that enhances national pride of a country.
On the other hand various drawbacks can be noted. In first place, restoring ancient artifacts and preserving them would involve significant costs. Such sites are often a source of income for an administration to fund the excavation and archeological research. Offering free entry would mean that funds should be obtained from elsewhere which might not be feasible for economically challenged countries. Additionally, if such sites are free to visit, it may be considered unworthy and less significant by many people. On the other hand, if there are charges associated, people might consider visiting such sites valuable as part of their expeditions.
In conclusion, the disadvantages are of a greater importance compared to advantages. The entry charges paid by visitors are vital as the secure the maintaince of such rare educational resources and recognition to their significance. Given the situation, it is recommended that an administration charges nominal fees for all the museums in order to sustain it efforts in preservation of history and culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eness about local culture by attracting a large number of local visitors and international touris...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in preservation of history and culture.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6043956044 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11601712456 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600732600733 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6354129071 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201486700108 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633547797306 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463741588722 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120980830972 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444708767561 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.