In many parts of the world, families were larger in the past because people had more children. Do you think there were more advantages or disadvantages to being part of a large family in the past?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examp

Without any doubt, a family is the most crucial place for growing children. In the past, families have more children, even more, ten or eleven, being part of these families have advantages and disadvantages.
In the past years, having more children is a value for families, for instance, in countries, who had more son, be more wealthy, because their sons could help them in farmlands and these families could work more and get more results. Moreover, children never feel lonely, they could play with their brothers and sisters and also when they encounter difficulties, another member of the family could help them. They almost have a tight relationship and have better social communications skills.
On the other hand, being part of a large family has disadvantages. Every kid needs attention from their parents, but these families could not pay more attention to their children, they should divide their time for them. Some children might get depression or frustrated as they could not get enough affection. They also need some requirement for growing up, having lots of brothers and sisters cause that they stand in a waiting list to meet their requires. And in my point of view, one of the important things that large family kids face is less privacy, because when ten or eleven people live in a house, find peace, comfort zone becomes difficult.
In Conclusion, the family member is an essential subject in the modern world. In recently decads, families try to have less child to make a better situation especially mentally for them.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5984418408 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3344812231 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298017576779 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131592528861 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101572894322 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201578607134 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879906323154 0.0819641961636 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.