Many people work long hours, leaving very little time for leisure activities. Does this situation has more advantages or disadvantages?
Nowadays, a lot of people give priority to their professional life instead of thinking about social life concurrently. They spend more time on their work rather than a little me time. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of longer working hours.
In order to survive in a cutthroat competition, people tend to work for longer hours to get the benefit of satisfactory appraisal and bonus. As the world is changing rapidly it is necessary to cope up with the dynamic environment and that is only possible by spending more time to work to remain update and learning as much as possible. For instance, one can fulfil his dreams by spending crucial time in potential task. Advocate needs to be updated all the time because of persistently change in law and regulations. And also, it is a well-known fact that legends do not pass their time in unproductive activities.
Alternatively, longer working hours has more disadvantages as it results in the imbalance of work and social life. If people do not have time to relax there would be a lot of negative consequences on their health as these activities not only keep the mind refresh but also provide energy. Meditation, hanging out with friends, having a fruitful time with family help to develop their bond as well as social life stronger. Lack of time for themselves make the person frustrated and sometimes result in belligerent behaviour. Apart from following the monotonous routine, it is extremely necessary to take out some relief hours.
To recapitulate, longer working hours help to achieve the desired objective and leads to betterment as well. As a contradiction of sorts, it is equally essential to take out spare hours from busy working schedule in order to balance personal as well as professional life. To be precise, the advantages of leisure activities outweigh its disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, apart from, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1335504886 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95840797422 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57654723127 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6264398181 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8125 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24488515045 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787963696972 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496390346938 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14625612254 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440641653551 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.