In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available fro building them is in the country side. Some people believe that it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
Due to increase in housing demand, governments are looking towards to expand the buildings in the countryside since most of the city do not left enough space to accommodate the demand. Personally, I do not agree with the housing expansion plan in the countryside. This essay will explain why this plan is a bad idea.
Firstly, the exploration and expansion of buildings can harm the environment as the expansion activities involved cutting and burning of the existing trees and plants. The environmental pollutions from such activities can also risk the sustainability of the city. A good example is that some cities in China are threatened by the draught crisis every year of typhoon season because of the expanding of city by removing the trees along the river bank.
Secondly, the expansion can harm the animal ecosystem which is important for a balanced society. The food and living space of the animals, particularly forests, are destroyed by the housing development plan and as the result, many of the animals will be killed. For instance, the wildlife from Bago Yoma forest are killed every year due to the expansion plan of Bago City and the forest itself is almost extinct.
To conclude, authorities should find other housing solution because the expansion of new buildings in the countryside can disturb and damage the ecosystem of not only the animals but also the environment. Finally, if governments force to carry out the plan, people living in these new locations will suffer the environmental problems at the later stage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'carrying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: carrying
...ironment. Finally, if governments force to carry out the plan, people living in these ne...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09842519685 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82600662997 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543307086614 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8090208992 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.727272727 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117091328382 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424308060317 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383520524343 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0724686346881 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413805541215 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.