The rise of convenience foods has helped people keep up with the speed of the modern life style. What are the advantages of this trend? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The consumption of fast foods increases during the current fast paced world. While some people support that the availablity of fast foods are good for society, others argue that it is leading to the bad things. In this essay, the benefits and drawbacks of the popularity of convenience foods among the people will be explained.
There are numerous advantages of fast foods. The most obvious benefit is their availability that fast foods are easily able to be accessed from everywhere. They are necessary for the modern lifestyle since people do not want to waste their time for finding a restaurant. For example, the biggest fast food chain, McDonald, can be found in every corners of the world and its popularity is huge among the society. Moreover, their attractive behavior, smell and taste, also helps them stand out from other traditional foods.
Despite of their benefits, the drawback of fast foods should not be neglected. According to the scientists, they are the major ingredients of obesity problem which becomes one of the biggest challenge between people in third-world countries. They are also pretty addictive and people are consuming foods beyond their everyday needs. Over consumption of calories leads to an obese society that in turn reduces the human life expectancy and productivity.
To conclude, despite of its advantages helping the fast-paced lifestyle, it fails to maintain the productivity and human life expectancy. My opinion is that the drawbacks of fast food cost more to our society than its benefits and governments should ban or increase the tax of fast food industry.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, third, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20769230769 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72865573684 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7184681927 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7142857143 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160044430044 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621305589572 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401926930227 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102744769743 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017197425165 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.