In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there
What is your opinion about this?
Nowadays, with rapid growth of population, citizenry need to accommodate in new homes therefore, constructing new buildings in new location is the crucial subject for governments. Some people think that building industry should be developed in towns, while others think differently. This essay will shed some light on this argument from both sides and extend my partial support to the later view before arriving at conclusion.
In principle due to jobs and job opportunities in big cities people try to live near their work places and we witness the lack of accommodation in these towns. Building companies may construct new apartments which use less land but can lodge more people in floors. On this way not only can managers solve these problems but also, they could protect the earth against irregular construction in cities. Moreover, by creating more residential complex in towns, suburbs will be saved far from hustle and bustle such as air pollution, water pollution, noise pollution and crowded streets hence countryside may use just for entertainments and relaxing time with eye-catching landscape and clear weather during the holidays. Furthermore, according to that, all medical, educational and welfare facilities was based in metropolises and administers put large amount of money to make them available for citizenry. It will be better if new homes will be built beside them that people use all their potential in their life. Because reconstructing new facilities in new places require big budget which can harm the economy of each countries.
On the other hand, in some individual’s opinion, since the price of lands far from the cities is very affordable, it is good that government encourage builders’ companies by giving them loan with long term refund for constructing new complex in suburbs. It is clear that the final price for those houses will be reasonable and people with middle level of salary can buy their own home. In addition, the system of transportation will be grown if builders build apartments in countryside. Leaderships have to solve the transportation problems for those areas; therefore, they should expand the access ways such as railroads, highways and even they should develop the number of metro station. I should mention that one of the best ways for improving financial situation each country is developing their roads, so by constructing houses around the cities may answer to these kinds of problems too. One off the best solution for reducing the pollution in megacities is by decreasing the rate of pollution. The most suitable way is constructing new residential areas in outskirts. People can immigrate there, consequently the rate of pollution will be minimized and citizenry will be healthier in towns.
At the conclusion, in my front of view, expanding and shifting building to countryside is one of the crucial subjects that government should pay attention to them as soon as possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1013, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... use all their potential in their life. Because reconstructing new facilities in new pl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 7.85571142285 293% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2496.0 1615.20841683 155% => OK
No of words: 473.0 315.596192385 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27695560254 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96506031535 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549682875264 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8042976434 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.368421053 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8947368421 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25714443593 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783038895858 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541743097171 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164416310219 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593027180429 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.