Medical technology advancements a blessing or a curse?
In the tech-savvy era, tremendous advancements are made in the medical Sector. In recent years, there is a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the merits and boom of the medical advancements. While it is possible to claim that the growth in technology has negative impacts on mankind. Howbeit, I debunk from them and proffer that technology advancement is a benediction to the society.
On the positive side,compelling pieces of evidence are obtainable to demonstrate the notation of the advantages of medical enhancements. The paramount concrete reason is, it allows us to save millions of lives. To go hand in hand, a supernal rationale which drags me to persist is the fact that it helps to find a cure for life-threatening diseases such as HIV, Cancer. Moreover, the hindmost feature which is inextricable to be accounted is the feature to eradicate diseases. According to research conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO), the rate of people who died due to medical inability is constantly decreasing since the 1980s.
On the other hand, those who argue that medical improvements are jinx has a different view and say that it can actually be a curse to human life. Furthermore, they claim that these advancements give us a greedy desire to live long which might be a burden for the family members to meet the financial and medical needs.
To conclude, I pen down saying that there are innumerable robust factors underpinning the fact that technology advancements in Medical sector is a blessing. Ergo, its contrary can be curbed. Consequently, I firmly acknowledge that the growth in medical technology is bliss.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s and boom of the medical advancements. While it is possible to claim that the growth...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , compelling
...o the society. On the positive side,compelling pieces of evidence are obtainable to de...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16236162362 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12112997523 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583025830258 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2112406865 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9285714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311026142262 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947076057497 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786321761035 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188273760325 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860212275769 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.