Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is certain that our nature, nowadays, is negatively affected in this era of cutting-edge technology. While a number of individuals believe that the remedy is expected to come from the technology itself, however, I contend that we should change our lifestyle to overcome this obstacle.
On the one hand, it is obvious that the modernized technology posing detrimental effects on the environment. As a result, our planet and its biodiversity is facing tremendous negative consequences like global warming, spreading deadly diseases like ebola, swine flue and so on. Therefore, day-by-day it is getting difficult to live healthy life in this universe. To overcome this challenges, technology itself can play a major role by inventing environmentally friendly equipments and medicines. For example, low greenhouse gases emitting devices or vaccines against the latest strains of viruses like H5N7 may alleviate the menace. However, unfortunately, these inventions are costly, and therefore unaffordable for most of the people.
On the other hand, small changes in our lifestyle can also have profound positive effect on nature. These little rectifications can have a vigorous change in the nature. Moreover, it also significantly mitigates the contamination. For instance, motivating citizens to use their feet or bicycle to commute to small distance and fuel-efficient hybrid cars for travelling longer distance can play a pivotal role to shape the nature living friendly. These can be legitimated by the government or the international bodies.
All things considered, technology itself cannot resolve the environmental hazards completely. I firmly convict that alteration of the living pattern of mankind can have a discernible positive impact on the nature and this is much easier to implement.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61538461538 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20076521463 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626373626374 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6391261752 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169941696232 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542054025535 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636322083993 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110168344745 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589835835021 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.