Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Technology has become an intricate part of our life, and how it affects our environment is a growing concern among the scientists. While some people believe that, to reduce its impact, we need to start living a simple life, others argue that a solution must come from technology itself. In my opinion, living a simple life would hinder the human growth, so we must try to resolve the issue with the use of technology.
As a starting point of discussion, let us analyze the implications of living a simple life, on environment and the growth of mankind. To begin with, imagine a world without any automobile, machines, and other equipment. As a consequence, the climate would be unadulterated stage as earlier. However, this would also result in a stagnant life for every human being. For instance, people would not be interested in inventions, and there would be no improvement in our lives.
To eradicate technology completely is an unachievable task. Nowadays, we rely on technology for our basic tasks, and it makes it convenient for us to accomplish difficult tasks. Not only simple activities such as booking a cab or ordering food online, but also complicated missions like exploring space, are possible because of technology. Moreover, in the last few decades, scientist have Invented many sustainable solutions with no or less harmful impact on environment. For instance, the electric car: an alternative for diesel and petrol cars. Companies have increased use of renewable resources as well. Hence, the quest for finding sustainable solution is taking place.
After reading the above arguments, for the benefit of progress of human race, we should consider relying on technology to provide a solution to reduce its impact on environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 432, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...nvented many sustainable solutions with no or less harmful impact on environment. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19649122807 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94076118228 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60701754386 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7929701631 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5625 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182574928642 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525290388411 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595296059868 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117421021055 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058407945255 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.