Some people think that governments should invest more in public services instead of wasting money on arts such as music and paintings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Every year the government plans a budget for the country. Whether it should invest more in public services or provide funding for art is a debatable question. While many would agree with the later point, in this essay would provide arguments for why I majorly support the previous point.
While choosing the public services over art for financing, there are mainly two significant reasons which come to my mind. Firstly, the money the government possess is collected in the form of tax from the citizens, so it should be use according to their needs. For instance, the villages require improved infrastructure, education, hospitals, and if art attracts major funds then nothing would be left for all these needs. investing in public sector is important not only for the people of villages, but also for the betterment of the society as a whole. To clarify further, take an example of the METRO train in the cities with heavy traffic such as Mumbai, Bangalore, and Delhi, it has resulted in less time for commute and as consequence more productivity of the people.
There are some persuasive points left, that would cause me hesitate to give my 100% support for the arguments stated above. To begin with, music, painting and other forms of art reflect the culture of a country and by funding them, the government promotes its own culture, which results in increase of tourism. Moreover, it encourages more people to become experts in these fields, and as a consequence employment increases.
The above paragraphs provide balanced points for both the arguments, however, my opinion swings slightly more in the favor of the public services than of art. As a suggestion, while making the budget, the government should allocate more funds to general services more, while taking into consideration the advantages of investing in art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... tax from the citizens, so it should be use according to their needs. For instance,...
^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Investing
...hing would be left for all these needs. investing in public sector is important not only ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09240924092 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66677286329 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594059405941 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6029106575 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.692307692 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223095936283 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850584999051 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603720693964 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146343606216 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369844579898 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.