Modern technology, such as personal computers and the internet, has made it possible for many people to work from their home. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this situation?
More and more people have opted to work from home since the latest technologies enabled them to do so. Despite the apparent drawbacks of this trend, I believe that its benefits outweigh such challenges.
There are two fundamental disadvantages of this scheme. One major challenge is that those working from their flats or apartments rely on a stable internet connection to maintain communication with their colleagues. Unless they can secure a high-speed networking solution at their places, their productivity levles will be suffered. Another difficulty is the lack of face-to-face interactions between coworkers when people work from home. This means that professionals who work from external locations might feel less connected to their team. Nevertheless, these issues can be addressed by investing in high-speed internet data plans at home or video-calling with other team members more regularly to enhance their relationships.
On the other hand, enabling employees to work from anywhere will bring an array of benefits to both employers and their workers. Firstly, the possibility to work from home enables parents to keep their jobs while taking care of their young children. Otherwise, young mothers might have to quit their job to do housework, resulting in an impact to the workforce. Secondly, instead of commuting for hours to get to work in large cities, people who live far from their offices can avoid transit time by working from home. Finally, companies’ owners will save significant costs when they support that model of work because fewer people in the offices leads to smaller office spaces and lower operating costs.
In conclusion, though working from home could be challenging for some, it seems to me that the gains are more significant than those difficulties.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37102473498 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89738429367 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625441696113 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5491180751 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311809610517 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110973083172 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513021513039 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17831461916 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463230195098 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.