Some people prefer hobbies that require technology, while some people hobbies do not require technology.
Discuss the both views and give your opinion
People have different preferences about their leisure pursuits. While some people enjoy activities that relate to technology, I prefer spending relaxing time without the presence of technology in any form.
There are many reasons why some individuals would love to employ technology to past time. The key rationale is that since digital devices such as smart phones and televisions consist full of exciting contents, people often turn to these electronics for entertainment. To illustrate, many youngsters enjoy watching hilarious movies with their phones when they have free time. In the recent years, people are obsessed with connected devices because they are accessible and inexpensive to maintain. With a budget phone, one could entertain with various activities such as playing game, watching movies or surfing the internet. Meanwhile, it is worth to mention that the obsession with technology may introduce adverse ramifications in the long-term.
Therefore, I believe that it is better to spend time in the nature or with people to recover or relax. This is because as an extrovert, I recharge myself when I interact with human. Networking is my favorite hobby during my spare time. Not only does social interactions make me fell connected, but it also enhances my soft-skills. Moreover, by spending time in the nature and away from technology, it would help people to rejuvenate after long hours at work. Personally, if I am free in the weekend, I would run in a local park to revitalize myself.
In conclusion, while many people prefer hobbies that involve technology, I would argue that a person should spend time with people or nature as leisure pursuits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...uals would love to employ technology to past time. The key rationale is that since digita...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24253731343 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84216444853 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1983935354 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194273089314 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665894966347 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802311327172 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163116111523 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929696987418 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.