People living in cities today do not get enough exercise. Why? What can be done to solve this problem?
It is true that city dwellers should be more active in order to maintain good health. Although there are many reasons for their lack of physical activities, this situation could be addressed by encouraging more people to exercise in some practical ways.
There are two primary reasons why people residing in metropolises have too little workout in their daily routines. One key rationale is that many people are overwhelmed by the pressure of work and life. Professionals who work full-time, for example, have limited time left after-work to go to the gym or take part in physical exercises. Likewise, most people who live in city centers have to deal with traffic congestion which is a time-consuming problem in such areas. Another reason is that modern cities present only a handful of options for their citizen to keep fit. While there are more choices to take on physical activities in the countryside such as swimming in rivers or running in open fields, city inhabitants typically workout in the gyms or run in the parks.
It is possible, however, to take steps to improve the habit of exercising for those who live in modern cities. Firstly, government bodies should provide more public facilities for physical training purposes. If more training centers are accessible and free of charge, citizens will gradually take part in activities in these places. The governments can also subsidize private companies to establish affordable gyms across their cities, ensuring a broad coverage of training centers for people of all ages. Secondly, every individual should value their health over other priority such as work and money. Unless citizens make time to go to such sports centers, their fitness levels will remain the same. For instance, reading fitness books and watching health-related programs on T.V. can raise the awareness of viewers, resulting in appreciation for more personal fitness time.
In conclusion, though several reasons lead to insufficient physical activities in modern cities, practical measures are presented to improve the current situation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30909090909 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75600354781 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584848484848 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1470126753 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110208302692 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382598103542 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394811067906 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0671622120278 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491617843672 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.