The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life.
it is true that companies nowadays attract talents at all ages to their workforce. while the multigenerational workplaces present unique challenges for the companies, I would argue that their productivity gains outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, the differences between colleagues in a diverse working environment may bring about difficulties for collaboration. From a collaborative perspective, communication channel preferences of different age groups may be varied depending on their age groups. Senior employees, for example, tend to opt for email or written documents, while younger people may opt for instant messaging tools such as Skype. From a human developmental perspective, employees at different ages typically have different career goals and aspirations, and this will urge the H.R. departments to develop a universal plan for all employees.
Nevertheless, companies that can leverage the dynamics of a multigenerational workforce will bring out the best in their people and build a healthy talent pipeline. Firstly, diversity drives innovations and healthy arguments from people with different perspectives. If a company has only people with the same view, it will possibly run into blind spots due to limited viewpoints. Secondly, having a range of employees at different ages will ensure sustainable business growth with proper resources to fill potential positions. Moreover, instead of hiring managers from external candidates, such firms can develop their own leaders from the pool of young employee.
In conclusion, though a multigenerational workplace may inhibit some challenges at the surface, it seems to me that such workplace brings about more benefits for the company in the long-term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
it is true that companies nowadays attra...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is true that companies nowadays attract...
^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...talents at all ages to their workforce. while the multigenerational workplaces presen...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tivity gains outweigh the drawbacks. On the one hand, the differences between...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a universal plan for all employees. Nevertheless, companies that can leverag...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 289, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...ent perspectives. If a company has only people with the same view, it will possibly ru...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers from the pool of young employee. In conclusion, though a multigenerationa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79377431907 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30750285924 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634241245136 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9897860475 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.083333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103394025502 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392667925328 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357394647413 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585833135303 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287449910605 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.