In modern times, young adults are spending less time with their families and more time with their friends.
Why has this change occurred?
Do you think parents should force their children to spend more time at home?
Youngsters, these days, are prioritizing their friends over family members as they are found to be devoting more time to the former rather than latter. I ponder that this scenario is in place owing to the thinking of youth that friends would understand them in a better way. While, forcing the children would not offer any fruitful result and rather a more rational approach would work.
To embark upon the reason of this trend, young people stay distant from elderly due to generation gap. In other words, it is ubiquitous that there is a huge gap on the basis of perspective, lifestyle, interests, hobbies etcetera in both generations because of which lack of understanding further leads to conflicts. Parents have an urge to make children do what they want whilst, on contrary, autonomy is what adolescents desire. To illustrate this, it is a general trend that children lock them up in their rooms once they reach home from their schools or coaching classes so that they could not touch base with their parents. Hence, differentiation in various aspects roots this problem.
However, I am not in favour of stern ways of handling this situation. Emphasising the fact that teenagers should devote some time to parents will make them even stubborn. Alternatively, an amiable bond needs to be developed by parents with their children wherein both could share their thoughts about every aspect alike friends. This will, eventually, make parents as first friend of their kids and ultimately, kids will find spending time with parents enjoyable. Regarding this, take an example of Western countries where the children are treated and respected as adults and parent-child relationship is more like friends who call each other with their names. Thus, being companion of a child would make him/her stay with family rather than forcing.
To reiterate, it can be said that undoubtedly, a biological gap in both generations have rooted this problem that youth finds spending time with their family, a burden. Yet, I am quite certain that minor change of perspective and efforts to make each other a friend would curtail this issue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, regarding, so, thus, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06267806268 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63195441309 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8662740611 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395774457874 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11157608128 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084936942286 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228472672527 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742551637876 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.