More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to solve this problem?
It has been quite a concerning fact that the a higher count of wild animals have approached the brink of extinction while the figure of the ones which are vulnerable, is also burgeoning. The root cause of this threat is ever- increasing deforestation which can be mitigated once revolutionary measures are taken towards the provision of suitable habitat to these animals.
The principle factor responsible for the extinction is reckless logging of trees in order to meet the selfish needs of humans. In other words, land clearing is done for expanding the infrastructure whereas, at times, the timber from trees is used to enhance the aesthetics of human houses. In this case, mankind forgets that they are robbing the shelter of animals which results in their death, either due to accidents as they wander around or because of hunger. The wild animals such as Asian Elephant and Giant panda, for example, are listed as critically vulnerable since they have no place to settle or hunt. Therefore, human’s self-centric mentality has ruined the life of other creatures of this planet.
On contrary, the remedy to this issue is to establish national parks, sanctuaries and zoos for these animal where they can live peacefully. These establishments would look after the necessities related to diet which would eliminate the jeopardy of being died and further, reproduction can also take place for increasing the count. Its best example is Gir National Park which is home to hundreds of lions now after the success of conservation programmes and as per the reports of 2019, the count of lions has doubled even. Thus, secure environment for living is what these animals require.
To reiterate, it can be said that the species of wild animals are in danger because of human pursuits which go against sustainable development. Yet, if measures are taken in time by offering equal space of planet earth to these animals, biodiversity can be saved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...t has been quite a concerning fact that the a higher count of wild animals have appro...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reiterating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: Reiterating
...r living is what these animals require To reiterate it can be said that the species of wild...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...ng equal space of planet earth to these animals biodiversity can be saved
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95015576324 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68038078354 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573208722741 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 321.0 20.2975951904 1581% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1589.0 106.682146367 1489% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 321.0 20.7667163134 1546% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 89.0 7.06120827912 1260% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255415107518 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.255415107518 0.084324248473 303% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145136181062 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159152029788 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 162.4 13.0946893788 1240% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -254.34 50.2224549098 -506% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 128.5 11.3001002004 1137% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.91 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.54 8.58950901804 274% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 130.4 10.1190380762 1289% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.