More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to solve this problem?
A large number of animal species are getting vanished while others are in the queue of getting extinct. This is primarily because of several human activities such as, forest destruction and poaching. There are a number of solutions, which can be implemented to reverse this loss and uphold these species on the earth.
Firstly, the main reason for the loss of many species is the human intervention in the wildlife. In other words, in order to explore various resources like fossil oil, we have destructed a large area of forests on a massive scale, which is home to most of the wild animals. Furthermore, in many parts of the world, the construction of roads and many commercial building has demolished a vast area of woodland and left numerous wild animals homeless, which further led to their death. Secondly, in many parts of the world, people still hunt wild animals and kill them, and further use their skin for creating clothes and other decorative items. As a result, several animals have lost their life.
There are two effective solutions, which may contribute to preserving this extinct fauna. One way to tackle this is to ensure that the government should encourage people to use green energy like solar and wind energy than destroying jungles for crude oils and make the required equipment available on subsidized cost. By doing this, rather than investing a large amount of money on forest excavation, industrialists would rather use energy, which would be available conveniently. Another method of dealing with this lost biodiversity is that the government should enact stringent laws on the people who poach and charge them with the hefty fine or put them into jail if they breach the law.
In conclusion, having alternative energies for fossil fuels and strict laws against poaching are effective measures, which can be taken into consideration to prevent the loss of biodiversity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
A large number of animal species are getting vanished whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08280254777 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68015911287 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1960063159 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.769230769 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190737629822 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689966243725 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262031291638 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110630328286 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320365264863 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.